In a bold step that could reshape the landscape of world football, FIFA is reportedly considering expanding its flagship club competition to a staggering 48 teams—a move that signals both opportunity and controversy in equal measure.
While the 2025 edition of the Club World Cup in the United States will debut with 32 teams, this potential expansion to 48 clubs by 2029 reflects FIFA’s long-term ambition: to create a truly global tournament that mirrors the scale and spectacle of the men’s World Cup.
A Tournament of Titans—and Underdogs
The idea of a 48-team tournament introduces exciting prospects. Powerhouses like Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, and Palmeiras would no longer be the sole representatives of their continents. The door would open wider for teams from Africa, Asia, and North America—not just as token participants but as competitive forces with a real chance to make their mark.
Clubs from Egypt, South Korea, Morocco, and Mexico could gain regular exposure on a stage historically reserved for the ultra-elite. For fans, that means more diversity, more styles of play, and new narratives in the global football story.
European Pushback and the Politics of Prestige
Yet not everyone is applauding. Major European clubs are applying pressure, unhappy with the current UEFA cap that limits participation. Giants like Arsenal, AC Milan, and Atlético Madrid have been left out of the 2025 edition, despite having strong global followings and competitive records.
Their frustration stems from the limited allocation of European slots—12 in total—and FIFA’s two-club-per-country guideline, which restricts even the continent’s strongest leagues. With billions in revenue and branding power at stake, European clubs want more influence over the format and selection criteria.
An expanded 48-team model could be a compromise that appeases both sides: more room for elite European clubs, and more visibility for emerging football nations.
Commercial Windfall vs. Calendar Chaos
Behind the scenes, money is a powerful motivator. A larger Club World Cup could generate massive revenue through broadcasting rights, sponsorships, and ticket sales. FIFA sees a lucrative future in bringing the biggest names in club football to cities around the world.
But with great scale comes great complexity.
Players are already burdened with crowded calendars—domestic leagues, continental tournaments, and national team duties leave little room for rest. An expanded Club World Cup would only heighten concerns about fatigue, injuries, and the long-term health of the sport’s most important asset: its players.
Players’ unions and league associations have begun voicing their concerns, calling for better consultation and greater protection of player welfare.
A Defining Decade for Football
The next few years will be critical in shaping the future of global club football. If the 32-team format in 2025 succeeds—on the pitch, at the box office, and in fan engagement—FIFA’s hand will be strengthened in pushing forward a 48-team vision.
What’s at stake isn’t just the structure of a tournament. It’s the balance between global inclusion and competitive integrity. It’s a question of whether the game can truly be “for all” without becoming diluted. And it’s a test of whether football’s future will be decided in boardrooms or on the pitch.
One thing is certain: the Club World Cup is no longer an afterthought. It is becoming a battleground for football’s soul.
Discussion about this post