India’s team combination for the second Test against England at Edgbaston, which saw the inclusion of three new players – Nitish Kumar Reddy, Washington Sundar, and Akash Deep – has drawn sharp criticism and concern from former Indian captains Sourav Ganguly, Sunil Gavaskar, and Ravi Shastri. The notable omissions included pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah (rested) and specialist spinner Kuldeep Yadav.
Questionable Spin Combination
Despite anticipation that Kuldeep Yadav, a wicket-taking wrist-spinner, might get a chance on a pitch expected to offer some turn, India opted for Ravindra Jadeja and the all-rounder Washington Sundar as their two spinners. This decision raised immediate flags for former captains:
- Sourav Ganguly expressed his doubt during the Day 1 tea break, stating, “I am not sure whether India are playing their two best spinners.” He also voiced surprise at England choosing to field first, suggesting it was “India’s best possible chance” to score big.
- Sunil Gavaskar echoed this sentiment, admitting he was “a little baffled that Kuldeep wasn’t picked, because on a pitch like this, where everybody says there’s a little more turn.” He argued that while India made over 830 runs in the first Test, their primary need was strengthening the “wicket-taking department,” not necessarily the batting, thus questioning the inclusion of Washington Sundar and Nitish Reddy for batting depth.
Disbelief Over Bumrah’s Resting
The decision to rest Jasprit Bumrah, a fully fit pace spearhead, for a crucial Test match has also been met with strong disapproval:
- Former India head coach Ravi Shastri expressed “disbelief” that Bumrah was given the option to sit out, emphasizing that the ace pacer should have played given India’s current struggles in Test cricket (only one win in their last nine matches since October last year). India lost the opening Test in Leeds by five wickets, making the second Test vital for leveling the series.
India captain Shubman Gill, at the toss, explained that Bumrah’s rest was for workload management and that they anticipate more assistance for pacers at Lord’s for the third Test. However, critics like Shastri believe that in a series where India is already down 0-1, their best bowler should be on the field, irrespective of future considerations.
The changes in the playing XI reflect India’s strategy to bolster batting depth, but the trade-off in specialist bowling options has left many cricketing pundits concerned about the team’s ability to take 20 wickets on what could still be a challenging English surface.
Discussion about this post