Bhubaneswar: Cricket, once a languid pursuit of patience and perseverance, has morphed into a high-octane spectacle driven by commerce and crowds.
This narrative traces the journey from the timeless Tests that birthed the sport to the adrenaline-fueled T20s that now dominate, unraveling why the original format has dimmed, why batsmen reign supreme, and why the art of classic bowling seems like a relic of a bygone era.
The Timeless Beginnings: The Dawn of Test Cricket
In the late 19th century, cricket emerged as a test of endurance, strategy, and skill. The first official Test match, played between Australia and England in 1877, set the stage for a format where games could stretch indefinitely until a result was achieved—or not. These “timeless” encounters, often lasting days, demanded mental fortitude from players and unwavering attention from spectators. Bowlers like W.G. Grace’s contemporaries ruled with guile and pace, while batsmen built innings like fortresses, brick by brick.
For over a century, Test cricket was the pinnacle, embodying the sport’s essence: a battle between bat and ball where weather, pitch wear, and human resilience played starring roles. It was a narrative unfolding slowly, rewarding those who could adapt over sessions, not seconds.
The Limited-Overs Shift: From 60 to 50 Overs – The Birth of ODIs
By the 1970s, cricket’s guardians recognized the need for reinvention to attract broader audiences. The inaugural One-Day International (ODI) in 1971 between Australia and England introduced a 60-over format, later refined to 50 overs after the 1987 World Cup. This change was born from practicality—rain-shortened matches and the desire for guaranteed results.
ODIs injected excitement with field restrictions, colored clothing, and white balls, tilting the balance slightly toward batsmen. Yet, it retained Test-like elements: bowlers could still dominate with swing and spin, and innings required construction rather than destruction. The 1975 World Cup solidified ODIs as a commercial success, drawing massive crowds and TV viewership. However, as Mudar Patherya noted in a 2025 debate, this era also sowed seeds of change by accelerating batting approaches, crediting Sri Lankan innovators like Sanath Jayasuriya for ushering in aggressive play that influenced even Tests.
The T20 Revolution: 20 Overs of Pure Adrenaline
The real disruption arrived in 2003 with Twenty20 (T20) cricket, initially a domestic experiment in England to boost attendance. The format’s global explosion came with the 2007 T20 World Cup and the Indian Premier League (IPL) in 2008. Games condensed to three hours, boundaries shrank, and innovations like powerplays and super overs favored explosive batting.
T20 transformed cricket into entertainment akin to a blockbuster movie—fast, furious, and financially lucrative. Franchises poured billions into leagues worldwide, luring players with mega-salaries. As former India coach Ravi Shastri remarked in 2024, “Spread the game through T20s,” advocating for limiting Tests to six or seven nations to prioritize the shorter format’s global appeal. This shift democratized the sport, with over 100 countries now participating, as Joy Bhattacharjya argued in the 2025 Telegraph National Debate, calling T20 “far more democratic” than the elitist 12-nation Test club.
Why Test Cricket Has Lost Its Sheen: A Slow Fade into Irrelevance?
Once the undisputed king, Test cricket now struggles for relevance amid packed calendars and waning interest. In regions like the West Indies, funding crises and player exodus to T20 leagues have decimated teams. As highlighted in a 2025 analysis, young talents view Tests as “outdated” compared to T20’s “fast money and instant fame,” with top players like Shimron Hetmyer skipping international duties for franchises. Globally, the ICC’s prioritization of T20s has diluted Test schedules, leading to mismatched contests and empty stands.
Pitches have evolved too—flatter surfaces in India and elsewhere reduce home advantage, as R. Ashwin explosively claimed in 2025: “The problem in India is every surface has a different identity… It becomes a very ordinary Test match pitch.” Virat Kohli echoed this, pushing for fixed Test centers to preserve quality: “We should have five Test centres, period.” Shorter attention spans and digital distractions further erode appeal, though some argue 2025 marks a “golden period” with more decisive results. Yet, as Ian Chappell has long warned, administrative failures and the “abysmal” pace of play endanger the format.
The Ascendancy of Batsmen: How the Game Tilted Toward the Willow
Modern cricket’s batsman dominance stems from rule changes and equipment evolution. Thicker bats, denser wood, and smaller boundaries have made edging for sixes commonplace, as a 2023 Reddit discussion lamented: “Bat thickness and density has made Cricket so lop-sided in favor of batsmen.” T20’s influence encourages aggressive shots from ball one, infiltrating Tests where players like David Warner transitioned from slam-bang to red-ball success.
Research shows handedness plays a role—batsmen with dominant top hands control shots better, but overall, formats reward power over technique. As Ricky Ponting observed in 2024, “The default setting now for batting is T20 and everything else works around that,” highlighting how mindsets have shifted toward risk-taking. High scores in fewer overs dominate, with bowlers often reduced to cannon fodder on flat tracks.
The Vanishing Art: The Plight of Fast Bowlers and Classic Spinners
Gone are the days when fearsome pacers like Dennis Lillee or enigmatic spinners like Shane Warne dictated terms. T20 demands economy over wickets, sidelining swing and seam in favor of variations like slower balls. In Tests, batsman-friendly pitches and heavy workloads injure fast bowlers, while spinners struggle without turning tracks.
Arjuna Ranatunga, in 2025, blamed T20 obsession: “The quality of cricketers is going south… The lure of the riches of franchise cricket is compromising the value of representing the country.” Experts like Mark Boucher note adaptations: “The mindset that has changed… T20 has probably brought to cricket in general,” allowing reverse sweeps but diminishing traditional bowling craft.
Echoes from Legends: Viewpoints from Cricket’s Old Guard
Old stars lament the soul’s loss. Syed Kirmani, a 1983 World Cup winner, decried modern cricket’s “declining sportsmanship,” feeling “ashamed” by politics and gestures in 2025’s Asia Cup. Rahul Dravid, in 2025, broke down batting changes: “Although in his time it was not an advantage because of the rise in T20 cricket, Dravid feels being tall gives a batter considerable advantage.” Sachin Tendulkar, ever the purist, insisted in older views echoed in 2025 tributes: “Test is the purest form of cricket. It should not be tinkered with.”Kirti Azad called T20 “a Chinese product… like two-minute noodles, sumptuous but not nutritious,” emphasizing Test’s lessons in adversity. Dilip Doshi praised T20’s “boldness” but affirmed Test as “ageless and indestructible.”
Contemporary Wisdom: Latest Quotes from Experts
Today’s voices are divided. Ryan Rickelton shocked in 2025: “Test cricket is very hard, but… T20 cricket is harder than Test cricket.” Dinesh Karthik urged balance: “People who choose Test cricket over T20s should be financially wealthy and have enough opportunities to compete.” Rohit Sharma added: “Wouldn’t put Test Cricket over T20 cricket or… representing the country is a pinnacle.” Graeme Smith noted technique shifts: “Players are thinking about power… Technically, they’re set up differently.”
Whither the Gentleman’s Game? A Crossroads of Tradition and Modernity
Cricket’s evolution reflects society’s pace—faster, flashier, but perhaps shallower. Test cricket’s sheen may have dulled, overshadowed by T20’s glitter, yet its depth endures for purists. As Mukul Kesavan wisely stated, Tests and T20 are “two completely different creatures,” each with merits. The challenge lies in coexistence, lest the game’s soul be lost forever in pursuit of profits.
Discussion about this post