The exclusion of Sarfaraz Khan from India’s Test squad for the upcoming England tour has triggered a wave of criticism against head coach Gautam Gambhir and selection chief Ajit Agarkar. Sarfaraz, who made a promising start to his international career, now finds himself sidelined despite doing little wrong—a move that has left fans and former cricketers baffled.
Sarfaraz had impressed during the Test series against England earlier this year, notching up two half-centuries on debut and following it up with a commanding century against New Zealand. His performances were lauded for both flair and composure—attributes that India has long sought in a reliable middle-order batter.
However, as India prepares for a five-match Test series in England, Sarfaraz’s name is conspicuously missing. He was initially part of the India A squad for the England Lions series but was dropped for the second match, reportedly to make way for senior player KL Rahul. Since then, there has been no word of his inclusion in either the A or senior team for the England tour.
Former India opener Aakash Chopra didn’t hold back in his criticism. “Sarfaraz Khan hasn’t done anything wrong,” he said in a recent YouTube video. “He scored 92 runs for India A and was then left out. If you had to judge his technique in foreign conditions, then at least let him play a few games.”
Sanjay Manjrekar echoed similar concerns, pointing out the inconsistent standards in selection. “You are pre-empting performance,” Manjrekar said. “You’re choosing Karun Nair, who scored the bulk of his Test runs in one innings, while Sarfaraz has consistently performed both in domestic and international cricket.”
While selectors may have tactical concerns—perhaps about Sarfaraz’s technique against seam and swing in English conditions—the lack of clear communication and transparency has raised eyebrows. The decision also draws comparisons with how other players have been handled more generously despite modest returns.
With a new leadership group in place—Shubman Gill leading the side and Rishabh Pant named vice-captain—India is entering a transitional phase in Test cricket. Yet the omission of an in-form, performing player like Sarfaraz Khan raises larger questions about meritocracy, fairness, and the accountability of selectors.
As the England series looms, the debate around Sarfaraz’s absence is likely to persist. For now, a talented batter waits on the sidelines, while public pressure mounts on those who decided he shouldn’t be part of India’s immedia
te Test future.
Discussion about this post